On my most recent trip to the book store I picked up a copy
of Bernard Cornwell’s book The Empty Throne, part of his Saxon Tales
series, which I have enjoyed and will post about soon. One of the things I
enjoy about Cornwell is the depth he gives his world and as I read this time I paid
special attention to how he does this and I think that part of it has to do
with his background characters.
Depth is one of the things that I think separates a good
story from a great story. You can have a good all-around story, but if you don’t
color in the back ground and give a good sense of the world in which it takes
place, you can end up with it feeling rather flat and two dimensional.
Cornwell does a wonderful job of filling out his world with
characters who may only appear once or twice, but he keeps them connected. What
his hero, Uhtred, does to one character may be heard of again from someone so
that the reader gets the impression that there is a world outside of the main
character’s plot, one that goes on when the main character isn’t there.
Take for example King Hywell, who appears on one of Uhtred’s
travels to Wales. Uhtred is only around Hywell for about 30 pages in a 300 page
story, and Hywell isn’t even mentioned in most of it. Uhtred just happens to be going about his
business in the same area, and the two interact for a bit before parting ways. As
they part, Hywell says
“ ‘So’
he continued, 'your Aethelflaed will hear of war in our land, but assure her it
is not her business. It is ours. Leave us alone and we will leave you alone.’”
There is little mention elsewhere of Hywell or the wars he
speaks of, and Uhtred soon sails back to England to go back to fighting the
Danes, but those pages spent with Hywell give the story a sense of depth, and
the sense that Cornwell is telling a story that takes place in a complex and
deep world, as opposed to a two-dimensional set containing just his primary
characters.
Other authors utilize secondary characters similarly, such
as The Gaffer and the innkeeper Barliman Butterbur or the warden Hama in The
Lord of the Rings. The Gaffer especially does little to further the plot,
but these characters help to fill out the story and give a sense of place that
makes the reading experience more in-depth. Secondary characters are often used
to move the plot along, but it is important to remember, if you are a writer,
that these characters are characters, not plot devices, and they have their own
motivations and personalities. Not all of it may make it into the story, but it
needs to be imagined to create a sense of realism and to avoid the impression
that they exist soley for the benefit of the plot.
…All of which is illustrated hilariously in this teaser for
the Sherlock Holmes Special. Hope you enjoyed the read, and I’m curious who are
some of your favorite secondary characters? Comment below!
Secondary characters are SO important, and I think their development has been largely abandoned by more recent writers. One of the reasons I enjoyed the Hunger Games trilogy was because of all the colorful side characters. Effie, Haymitch, Cinna, Finnick, and Rue all add to the story in a way that makes it more memorable. (The Divergent Trilogy let me down vastly on this score.) And you have to love Watson :) Still waiting for my parents to preview season 2 (again) so I can resume Sherlock ;)
ReplyDelete